Senate Bill 1255 came into effect on January 1, 2015. The bill amended Section 647 of the Penal Code, which provided that a person who caused emotional distress by distributing an image of another identifiable person’s intimate body parts, where the parties understood the image was to remain private, was guilty of disorderly conduct – a misdemeanor. The amended provision provides that a person who causes emotional distress by intentionally distributing an image of another identifiable person’s intimate body parts, or an image of the person depicted engaging in sexual acts (i.e. a “selfie”), where the parties understood the image was to remain private, is guilty of disorderly conduct. As of July 1, 2015, a related assembly bill will add Section 1708.85 to the Civil Code, which creates a private right of action that permits an aggrieved party to bring a civil suit against the violator for harm related to invasion of privacy, as well as any other legal or equitable relief available, including an injunction. It also allows for recovery of costs and attorneys’ fees, and permits a plaintiff to proceed using a pseudonym rather than his or her true name.
California Revenge Porn Law Amended to Include Selfies
California Revenge Porn Law Amended to Include Selfies
Related Posts
There are about twenty state privacy laws currently in effect or that will take effect by January 2026 that […]
These excerpts from Practical Guidance, a comprehensive resource providing insight from leading practitioners, are reproduced with the permission of LexisNexis. […]
This excerpt from Practical Guidance, a comprehensive resource providing insight from leading practitioners, is reproduced with the permission of LexisNexis. […]
Multiple state Privacy Acts take effect in 2023. Typically, these laws require website operators to implement certain compliance measures and […]
Kavon Adli, founder and managing attorney of The Internet Law Group, has been selected for inclusion in the Southern California […]
By Kavon Adli and Jason Civalleri * For informational purposes only; not intended as legal advice or as a recommendation/suggestion […]
After the Leys’ dog killed neighbor Jeppson’s cat, the Leys paid Jeppson $2,000 as part of a settlement agreement. After […]
On May 3, 2019, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Defendant’s motion to compel […]
On March 4, 2019, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, delivering a unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, […]
We are pleased to announce that Kavon Adli, shareholder at The Internet Law Group, has been selected to the 2020 […]