In Rosolowski et al. v. Guthy-Renker LLC, Case No. B250951 (Cal. Ct. App., 2nd Dist., Div. 3, order entered October 29, 2014), a California court of appeals held that a header in a commercial email does not misrepresent the sender’s identity simply because it fails to identify the name of the entity that sent it, or because it fails to identify an entity with a traceable domain name, as long as the sender’s identity is readily ascertainable from the email body. California Business & Professions Code section 17529.5 prohibits email ads with falsified, misrepresented, or forged header information, or that contain a subject line likely to mislead a recipient about a material fact regarding the contents or subject matter of the message. In this case, defendant’s emails were ads for its consumer brands and the emails provided a link to its Web site, an unsubscribe notice, and physical address. The bodies also clarified that the free gift mentioned in the “subject” line was contingent on a purchase, although the subject line did not refer to the purchase agreement.
Information in Email Body May Overcome Otherwise Actionable Header, Subject Line
Information in Email Body May Overcome Otherwise Actionable Header, Subject Line
Related Posts
There are about twenty state privacy laws currently in effect or that will take effect by January 2026 that […]
These excerpts from Practical Guidance, a comprehensive resource providing insight from leading practitioners, are reproduced with the permission of LexisNexis. […]
This excerpt from Practical Guidance, a comprehensive resource providing insight from leading practitioners, is reproduced with the permission of LexisNexis. […]
Multiple state Privacy Acts take effect in 2023. Typically, these laws require website operators to implement certain compliance measures and […]
Kavon Adli, founder and managing attorney of The Internet Law Group, has been selected for inclusion in the Southern California […]
By Kavon Adli and Jason Civalleri * For informational purposes only; not intended as legal advice or as a recommendation/suggestion […]
After the Leys’ dog killed neighbor Jeppson’s cat, the Leys paid Jeppson $2,000 as part of a settlement agreement. After […]
On May 3, 2019, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Defendant’s motion to compel […]
On March 4, 2019, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, delivering a unanimous opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States, […]
We are pleased to announce that Kavon Adli, shareholder at The Internet Law Group, has been selected to the 2020 […]